Under Turkish trademark law, Article 5(1)(h) of the Industrial Property Code provides that certain signs cannot be registered as trademarks: “Signs that contain religious values or symbols.” What Does This Mean? Trademark law prohibits the… Article 5(1)(h) Industrial Property Code: Religious Values and Symbols

Under Turkish trademark law, Article 5(1)(ğ) of the Industrial Property Code provides that certain signs cannot be registered as trademarks: “Signs other than those covered by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention but which are… Article 5(1)(ğ) Industrial Property Code: Public Interest Signs and Cultural Symbols

“Signs other than those covered by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention but which are of public interest, and which contain historical, cultural values, and emblems, badges or escutcheons for which the consent of the… Article 5(1)(g) Industrial Property Code: Public Interest Signs

Legal Text Signs which shall be refused pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention. 🔹 What Does This Mean? Under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention, certain symbols and emblems are given special protection.… Article 5(1)(f) IPC: Signs Which Shall Be Refused Pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention

🚫 Article 5(1)(f) SMK – Deceptive Trademarks: Public Deception as an Absolute Ground for Refusal Legal Text: “Signs which would deceive the public, for instance, as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the… 🚫 Article 5(1)(f) SMK – Deceptive Trademarks: Public Deception as an Absolute Ground for Refusal

Article 5(1)(e) – Turkish Industrial Property Code Signs which consist exclusively of the shape or another characteristic which results from the nature of the goods themselves or the shape or other characteristics which is mandatory… Absolute Grounds for Refusal –Article 5(1)(e); Shape, Functionality and Substantial Value Explained

Yargıtay 5. Hukuk Dairesi, marka hakkına tecavüz ve haksız rekabet istemli davada yargı yerini belirledi: Davacı marka sahibi kendi yerleşim yerinde ya da hukuka aykırı fiilin gerçekleştiği/etkilerinin görüldüğü yerde dava açabilir (SMK m.156/3). Somut olayda… Yargıtay 5. HD, 2025/6061 E., 2025/8774 K. – SMK m.156/3 Uyarınca “Marka Sahibi Davacı”nın Yerleşim Yeri Yetkisi

Bursa’da 1928’den bu yana üretilen Marşal Pastası, bugün Ulus Pastanesi ile başka bir işletme arasında hukuki mücadeleye konu oldu. Tartışma, bir yiyeceğin veya tatlının hangi hukuki yollarla korunabileceği sorusunu gündeme getirdi. Marka, patent, tasarım, haksız… 🍰 Bursa’nın Asırlık Marşal Pastası Davası: Yemekler Marka, Patent, Tasarım, Haksız Rekabet ve Telif Hukuku ile Nasıl Korunur?

Giriş Marka hukuku, modern ticaretin temel taşlarından biridir ve teşebbüslerin mal veya hizmetlerini piyasada diğerlerinden ayırt etmesini sağlayan işaretlerin korunmasını hedefler. Sınai Mülkiyet Kanunu (SMK) m. 4’e göre marka, bir teşebbüsün mal veya hizmetlerini diğer… Ticaret Unvanı ve Diğer Haklara Dayalı Marka İtirazı: SMK m. 6/3 ve 6/6 Kılavuzu

📜 Article 5(1)(d) – Legal Text: Signs which consist exclusively or include as an essential element of signs or indications used by everyone in the trade area or which serve to distinguish members of a… 🚫 Article 5(1)(d) – Signs Commonly Used in Trade